Demonstrates how protected areas conserve herbivores while limiting agricultural encroachment, suggesting improved conservation management is needed.
This study examines the long‐term effectiveness of protected areas (PAs) in the savannahs of West and Central Africa in resisting agricultural encroachment and conserving large herbivore populations. Using Landsat imagery (1973–2018) and wildlife census data, we evaluated land‐use and land‐cover change within ten core PAs and their surrounding 60‐km buffer zones, focusing on four focal species: african buffalo, roan antelope, hartebeest and savannah elephant. Results show that core PAs largely retained their natural vegetation, while surrounding landscapes experienced significant agricultural expansion—particularly in unprotected buffer zones. National parks, especially those embedded within connected networks such as the W–Arly–Pendjari complex, demonstrated stronger resistance to land conversion and higher herbivore biomass. However, wildlife population trends did not consistently align with landscape integrity, indicating that factors such as PA size, governance and ecological connectivity critically shape conservation outcomes. We identify three typologies of PAs—underperforming large reserves, integrated transboundary networks and small but well‐managed sites—each requiring distinct strategic approaches. These findings underscore the need for outcome‐focused conservation strategies that go beyond legal designation to address spatial planning, connectivity and local management capacity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mialhe et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: