The study investigates DNA damage and cell death in colorectal and breast cancer cells from ultra-high dose rate pulsed X-rays, suggesting new treatment options.
FLASH radiotherapy, characterized by ultra-high dose rates (> 40 Gy/s), potentially spares normal tissues while maintaining antitumor efficacy (the FLASH effect). While electron and proton FLASH are explored, pulsed X-ray sources like plasma focus devices offer unique possibilities. Previous work has reported hyper-radiosensitivity in colorectal cancer cells exposed to ultra-high-dose-rate pulsed X-rays from a kilojoule plasma focus (PF) device, without significant effects on non-cancerous cells. This study further investigates the biological effects of ultra-high-dose-rate (~ 10⁷ Gy/min), low-total-dose pulsed X-rays generated by a PF-2 kJ device on colorectal cancer cell lines, focusing on DNA damage, cell cycle progression, and gene expression. Low-total-dose (~ 0.25 Gy), ultra-high-dose-rate pulsed X-rays (0.025 Gy/pulse, a total of 10 pulses, pulses temporally separated by 15–20 s) generated by a PF-2 kJ device induced a significant increase in the SubG1 population in HCT116 and DLD1 cells over 72 h, an effect indicative of apoptosis, which was not observed with conventional X-rays at similar total doses. In addition, pulsed X-rays induced apoptosis in radioresistant MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Whereas conventional X-rays did not cause a significant increase in double-strand breaks (DSBs), surrogate marker γ-H2AX and phosphor-P53(Ser15) signal were detected 30 min following pulsed X-ray exposure and persisted for up to 24 h, and no evidence of G2/M cell cycle arrest was detected in exposed cells. Gene expression analysis and preliminary transcriptomic data further suggest a DNA damage response leading to cell death and global change in general biological processes related to regulation of gene expression. Low-total-dose (~ 0.25 Gy), ultra-high-dose-rate pulsed X-rays generated by a PF-2 kJ device induce significant and sustained DNA damage (DSBs) leading to increased apoptosis in colorectal (HCT-116, DLD-1) and breast (MCF-7) cancer cells, compared to conventional X-rays. These effects, coupled with distinct changes in gene expression, suggest that ultra-high-dose-rate pulsed X-rays may overcomeradio-resistancee without eliciting a conventional DNA damage repair or cell cycle checkpoint response. These findings support the potential of PF-generated pulsed X-rays as a novel sourcof e radiotherapy modality and warrant further investigation, particularly in in vivo models, to assess clinical applicability and safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Araya et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: