DAGRN shows improved predictive precision in travel time forecasting, suggesting advancements for data-scarce environments.
Travel time prediction (TTP) is a fundamental pillar of intelligent transportation systems (ITS). However, deploying highly parameterized deep learning models in data-scarce environments—referred to as the “cold-start” problem—remains a critical bottleneck, frequently leading to overfitting and severe error accumulation on ultra-long trajectories. To surmount these limitations, this study proposes the Dual-Attentional Gated Residual Network (DAGRN), a data-efficient forecasting framework driven by a novel topology-temporal coordination mechanism. Specifically, the framework introduces three integrated innovations: (1) transforming the primal network into a physics-aware Line Graph to explicitly filter out illegal movements and dynamically modulating topological propagation via Feature-wise Linear Modulation (FiLM); (2) coupling a Bidirectional GRU backbone with a Multi-Head Attention module to simultaneously capture global trends and localized intersection delays; (3) employing a Gated Residual Fusion mechanism that preserves dimensional consistency and facilitates gradient flow in extensive sequences. To rigorously validate the model’s robustness, we conduct evaluations on a highly constrained, stratified dataset comprising merely 2000 trajectories. Experimental results demonstrate that DAGRN achieves state-of-the-art predictive precision with an RMSE of 415.485 s and an R2 of 0.848, significantly outperforming 12 advanced baseline models and reducing error by up to 13.8% against the strongest graph baseline. Comprehensive ablation studies confirm the absolute necessity of the Multi-Head Attention module, whose removal causes the most severe performance degradation (RMSE surging to 521.495 s). Ultimately, DAGRN presents a readily deployable solution for sparse-data ITS regimes, actively paving the way for future hybrid integrations with microscopic traffic simulations and evolutionary road network optimization algorithms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: