Shaking table tests reveal magnetorheological dampers improve bridge performance under seismic conditions, indicating effective energy dissipation strategies.
To address the limitations of conventional magnetorheological (MR) dampers in bridge engineering, particularly their lack of semi-active control algorithms and inadequate structural adaptability, this study develops a novel dual-chamber self-centering MR damper (DPSR-MRD) with an energy-feedback-based semi-active control strategy. The device integrates dual-chamber fluid interaction (MR fluid in the liquid cylinder and nitrogen gas in the gas cylinder) with a self-centering mechanism, enabling dynamic stiffness adjustment and bidirectional displacement control. An embedded control module adjusts current in real time using accelerometer feedback, while an energy-based algorithm optimizes damping force distribution, significantly improving seismic energy dissipation. Shaking table tests demonstrate the DPSR-MRD's superior performance under multidirectional seismic excitation, achieving 40.33%–47.99% reduction in mid-span displacement, up to 69.9% decrease in peak pier strain, and effective mitigation of localized stress concentration through asymmetric displacement control. Numerical simulations reveal its multi-scale control mechanism: macroscopically reducing overall structural response (up to 71.4% displacement reduction) and microscopically suppressing pier damage through magnetorheological coupling (264.94% reduction in strain). The DPSR-MRD combines adaptive stiffness reconfiguration, multi-modal energy dissipation, and fail-safe protection, offering a robust intelligent solution for bridge seismic mitigation and advancing MR technology applications in civil engineering disaster prevention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: