Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ethnographic research reveals digitalized migration influences mobility and citizenship for Turkish e-residents.
This study examines the intersection of digitalization, migration, mobility and citizenship through the case of Estonia's e‐Residency program and proposes the concept of digitalized migration. Unlike conventional migration approaches centred on physical relocation, the study conceptualizes digitalized migration as a selective transnational process in which individuals remain spatially immobile while integrating into another national context through digital infrastructures. Within this framework, e‐Residency is analysed as a form of mobility reconfigured through digital technologies that shares characteristics with migration. Empirically, the study is based on digital ethnographic observations of the online interaction networks of Turkish citizen e‐Residents, complemented by in‐depth interviews. The findings show that e‐Residency produces transnational forms of subjectivity through digitalized business practices, virtual mobility and platform‐based state‐citizen relations. Although Turkish e‐Residents pursue migration aspirations digitally, they remain embedded in local socio‐economic and political contexts, as their engagement with e‐Residency is primarily driven by economic opportunities rather than socio‐cultural integration. At the same time, e‐Residency operates as a digital border regime, limiting its cosmopolitan promise through selective access mechanisms, digital skill requirements and neoliberal mobility norms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kuş et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: