Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review of NMN reveals modest blood pressure reductions in adults, suggesting clinical implications for cardiovascular health.
Background/Objectives: High blood pressure remains a primary modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN) has emerged as a promising supplement; however, its efficacy with respect to blood pressure in humans is unclear. This meta-analysis systematically evaluated the effects of various NMN supplements on resting systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in adults with elevated blood pressure. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using the databases PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and EBSCO from their inception to 13 December 2025. R software was used to combine the data from the included original trials using a common-effects model. Subgroup analyses were performed based on age, baseline body mass index, geographical location, intervention duration, NMN dosage, and baseline blood pressure. Results: A total of 349 participants from 10 RCTs with 11 intervention arms were included. Compared with the placebo, NMN supplementation was associated with a statistically significant but modest reduction in resting DBP (WMD, −2.15 mmHg; 95% CI: −3.68 to −0.61). In contrast, the reduction in resting SBP was not statistically significant. Notably, subgroup analyses revealed that NMN supplementation resulted in a significant reduction in SBP specifically among participants aged 60 years and older (WMD: −3.94 mmHg; 95% CI: −7.06 to −0.82). Conclusions: Our findings provide preliminary and suggestive evidence that NMN supplementation may be associated with a small reduction in resting DBP and a modest beneficial effect on resting SBP in adults aged 60 years and older. However, the potential of NMN as a viable candidate for early-stage blood pressure management requires confirmation through long-term, large-scale, high-quality RCTs in future clinical studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: