PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 2026Punishment & Society0 citationsOpen Access

Carceral networking and penal liminality: A case study of a security NGO

View Full Paper
XDXavier Alexander DurhamUniversity of California System

Key Points

  • This study examines the role of security NGOs in facilitating employment for formerly incarcerated individuals and their impact on social capital.
  • Conducted 35 interviews with employees of the California-based security NGO Urban Alchemy.
  • Analyzed the employment experiences of reentry workers in the security sector.
  • Security NGOs challenge traditional workfare programs by offering stable job opportunities.
  • Employment experiences highlight a blurring of stigma and social capital for reentry workers.
  • Workers face increased surveillance from employers while leveraging police interventions for organizational goals.

Abstract

More than 600,000 people leave U.S. jails and prisons annually, a chronic policy concern for the penal state and welfare providers with many interventions recommending workforce development. However, job outlets are sparse, unstable, and often exploitative. But even as scholars document these conditions, their analyses are largely constrained to “classical” workfare programs rather than emergent job sectors. Indeed, security NGOs (non-governmental organizations) are hiring formerly incarcerated people, pushing the boundaries of how we conceptualize and measure the (re)production of socio-economic inequality. Drawing from 35 interviews with employees of the California-based security NGO Urban Alchemy, this paper offers two findings. First, reentry workers’ employment experience in the security sector indicates a blurring of stigma and social capital where people are finding work because of their record and without a third-party service provider. This “carceral networking” challenges how we study reentry success vis-à-vis the labor market. Second, reentry workers come to occupy a position of “penal liminality” that puts them at greater risk of surveillance from both their employers and penal agents while simultaneously leveraging police interventions to accomplish organizational goals. This tense dichotomy highlights how security work blurs the roles of those who police and those that are policed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Xavier Alexander Durham (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4ada918185d8a39801464https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745261425023
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper