Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This research demonstrates improved anti-tumor effects in cancer therapy, suggesting pro-senescence and senolytic strategies enhance treatment efficacy.
Senescence is recognized as a hallmark of cancer. However, the senescent process can have context-dependent beneficial or detrimental roles in various pathological settings, with distinct pro-tumorigenic or anti-tumorigenic abilities in combination therapy. Here, in this study, we established a senescence signature (SenScore) to estimate tumor senescence status. Multi-omics data, including mRNA expression, miRNA expression, protein expression, somatic mutations, somatic copy number alteration, and clinical data across 33 cancer types, were acquired from The Cancer Genome Atlas. A propensity score matching algorithm was used to balance the effects of potential confounders. We characterized senescence-related molecular features and identified various types of molecular alterations associated with both drug-resistant and drug-sensitive responses to anti-tumor drugs. We exhibited that 108 clinically actionable genes and 75 FDA-approved drugs were significantly biased on different senescence statuses across multiple cancer types. We further validated the most sensitive discovered drugs, roscovitine, pyrimethamine, and LFM.A13 in both bleomycin and H 2 O 2 -induced senescence conditions. Accordingly, the combined application of roscovitine and bleomycin was shown to produce a greater in vivo anti-tumor effect than bleomycin alone. Our study provides an integrated multi-omics landscape of molecular alterations associated with the tumor senescence process. These findings highlight the potential of leveraging senescence-induced vulnerabilities to design sequential pro-senescence and senolytic combination therapies, offering novel avenues for optimizing clinical cancer treatment strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: