This comprehensive review examines the emerging role of narrative medicine in radiation oncology education, exploring its theoretical foundations, implementation models, and reported outcomes. A systematic literature search was conducted across major databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, and World Health Organization's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for relevant studies published between January 2000 and March 2025. This comprehensive review approach enabled synthesis of diverse evidence types and implementation models in this emerging field. Despite the growing body of literature on narrative medicine in general medical education, its specific application within radiation oncology remains limited but promising. The review identifies several key domains where narrative medicine interventions show potential: Enhancing communication skills with patients undergoing complex treatments, developing resilience among trainees facing emotionally challenging clinical scenarios, and addressing burnout among radiation oncology professionals. Preliminary evidence, primarily from single-institution studies at large academic centers, suggests that structured reflective writing programs and narrative oncology curricula may effectively complement technical training in radiation oncology residency programs. However, significant gaps exist in the literature regarding standardized implementation approaches and rigorous outcome assessments. Cultural adaptations for implementing narrative medicine across different healthcare contexts are also explored. This review concludes that while narrative medicine offers promising approaches to humanize radiation oncology education, more robust research is needed to establish best practices, evaluate long-term impacts, and address implementation challenges in this highly technical specialty.
Duan et al. (Thu,) studied this question.