End-to-end framework predicts drug-target interactions and affinities, utilizing molecular graphs and tensor networks.
Predicting drug–target binding remains a central challenge in computational drug discovery, particularly due to the need for models that jointly capture molecular topology, chemical substructures, and protein sequence dependencies. We propose MSCMF-DTB, an end-to-end deep learning framework supporting both drug–target interaction (DTI) classification and drug–target affinity (DTA) regression. On the drug side, molecular graphs generated with RDKit are encoded using a DenseGCN module, while a parallel fingerprint channel captures fragment-level and compositional features. On the protein side, contextualized embeddings from TAPE-BERT are processed through a multi-scale 1D CNN to extract local sequence patterns. Cross-modal drug–protein relationships are modeled using cross-attention mechanism coupled with a tensor network for higher-order feature interaction. The fused representations are fed into an MLP for final prediction. Extensive experiments demonstrate that MSCMF-DTB achieves competitive and consistent performance across small- and large-scale datasets (Human, C. elegans, GPCR, BioSNAP, and DrugBank for DTI, and DAVIS and KIBA for DTA). Notably, on the large-scale DrugBank dataset for DTI prediction, MSCMF-DTB improved AUC and Recall by up to 3.2% and 6.1%, respectively, compared with the second-best model (DrugBAN). For DTA prediction, the model achieved stable performance on the large and heterogeneous KIBA dataset, with an MSE of 0.146, a Concordance Index of 0.886, and an rm² of 0.765. Attention-based interpretability further shows that the model learns biologically meaningful interaction regions. Finally, a cold-start case study indicates that MSCMF-DTB successfully identifies experimentally validated inhibitors to AKT1, illustrating its practical utility in virtual screening and drug repurposing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: