Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional observational study reports negative attitudes toward gene therapy in severe hemophilia, suggesting educational gaps exist.
Background: Severe hemophilia traditionally requires lifelong prophylactic treatment, which cannot fully prevent joint damage and significantly impacts patients’ quality of life. In recent years, gene therapy has been extensively researched as a potential cure with a single infusion, but it has not yet gained widespread acceptance. Objectives: This study examines the knowledge and attitudes of people with severe hemophilia regarding gene therapy to provide guidance to practitioners in the context of shared decision-making. Design: Cross-sectional observational study based on a standardized questionnaire. Methods: A questionnaire developed by Cutica, Ilaria et al. was evaluated in a self-reported, anonymized survey for a German cohort of 59 people with severe hemophilia. It covered sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, knowledge, attitudes, risk tolerance, and decision-making preferences. Results: Among 59 people with severe hemophilia A and 10 with severe hemophilia B, 59% expressed a predominantly rejective attitude toward gene therapy. Most had only general knowledge of gene therapy. Concerns about long-term side effects (e.g., cancer development) significantly contribute to a negative attitude toward gene therapy ( p = 0.005). People with hemophilia and an annual bleeding rate ⩾1 show a significantly higher willingness to consider or accept gene therapy ( p = 0.001). Rejection of gene therapy is significantly associated with high expectations regarding its duration of efficacy and the minimum clotting factor level. Conclusion: Further studies are needed to refine educational concepts for people with hemophilia and clear out misconceptions about gene therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Babayeva et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: