Review discusses gene therapy integration and its impact on hemophilia treatment and patient outcomes.
Gene therapy is reshaping the therapeutic paradigm in hemophilia by enabling sustained endogenous clotting factor production after a single administration. This approach moves disease management beyond lifelong replacement therapy. While clinical trials have demonstrated marked reductions in bleeding rates and treatment burden, real-world implementation has revealed emerging complexities. These include interindividual variability in transgene expression reflected by a progressive reduction in circulating FVIII or FIX activity over time, uncertainty regarding the long-term durability of expression, immune-mediated constraints, and episodes of transaminase elevation. This review addresses a critical transition point in the field: the shift from proof-of-concept efficacy toward integration of gene therapy into long-term hemophilia care. We examine determinants of therapeutic stability, host–vector immune interactions, and mechanisms underlying loss or fluctuation of expression, with emphasis on monitoring strategies and post-therapy management pathways. Immunogenic processes affecting vector transduction, hepatocellular responses, and transgene persistence are discussed alongside current approaches to immune modulation. This review uniquely focuses on post-gene therapy clinical integration rather than vector design or trial outcomes. Beyond direct factor correction, evolving therapeutic concepts targeting coagulation rebalancing and immune regulation are considered within a systems-based framework. Psychosocial adaptation and patient-reported outcomes are also explored, underscoring that therapeutic success extends beyond hemostatic control. In aggregate, these perspectives position gene therapy not as a singular curative event but as a component of an evolving, biologically integrated management strategy. Long-term follow-up translational research (LTFU) and coordinated global efforts will be essential to optimize durability, safety, and equitable access.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Serrafi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: