Framework identifies gaps in governance during ai incidents, implying the need for better technical standards and jurisprudence.
The Incident Boundary Diagnostic Instrument (IBDI) is a three-layer diagnostic framework for analyzing and training on AI incidents in regulated and high-stakes domains. IBDI integrates Boundary Intelligence (technical boundary and telemetry analysis), Emotional Indicators of Compromise (EIOC) (interaction-layer emotional and behavioral signals), and APR-Lite (governance controls for domain detection, friction, and finality) into a single scenario-based simulator and scoring engine. Each incident scenario is represented by a shared schema and evaluated through three coordinated diagnostic passes, producing both layer-specific scores and a unified remediation profile. Using the Nippon Life v. OpenAI disability-claim lawsuit as a worked example, this paper demonstrates how a single AI-mediated event can be decomposed into a boundary-visibility failure, an emotional-procedural escalation signature, and a substrate-layer governance gap. IBDI is published as timestamped prior art to support future jurisprudence, technical standards, and tool development in AI governance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Narnaiezzsshaa Truong (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: