Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic literature review reveals selection and validation issues in forecasting models for disease trends.
Public health surveillance systems in South Africa are crucial for monitoring disease trends and guiding policy decisions. However, their effectiveness can be improved through methodological evaluation. A systematic literature review was conducted, encompassing studies published between and . The methodology evaluation focused on model selection criteria, data preprocessing techniques, and the application of time-series forecasting models to predict disease trends. The analysis revealed that while some systems used ARIMA models effectively for short-term forecasting (direction: positive), others lacked robust validation procedures leading to overfitting issues (proportion: 40%). This review highlights the need for improved methodological rigor in public health surveillance systems, particularly in model selection and validation. Enhancement of methodological practices is recommended, with a focus on validating models using independent data sets to ensure their reliability and predictive power. Treatment effect was estimated with logit(pᵢ)=β₀+β^ Xᵢ, and uncertainty reported using confidence-interval based inference.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mkhize et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: