Conceptual framework models human action dynamics in interdisciplinary contexts, suggesting pathways for behavioral analysis and empirical testing.
The "value-action gap"—the pervasive phenomenon wherein individuals hold strong normative beliefs yet fail to act upon them—remains a persistent theoretical challenge across the social sciences. While traditional sociological frameworks offer profound insights into long-term behavioural reproduction, they frequently struggle to account for the rapid, context-dependent fluidity of modern human action. This paper introduces Flexible Practice Theory (FPT), an analytical mid-range socio-mathematical framework designed to address this theoretical void and presents an exploratory conceptual framework intended to stimulate academic discussion rather than provide a fully validated predictive model. By modelling human action as a real-time negotiation between internal dispositions (H, V, I), structural constraints (Cs), and a binary cultural governor (C), FPT offers a preliminary analytical baseline for behavioral analysis. This paper outlines the mathematical and analytical architecture of the model, demonstrates its operationalization through diverse real-world scenarios, and explores its potential as a collaborative foundation for interdisciplinary research. At this stage, the model should be interpreted as a conceptual and analytical proposal rather than a finalized predictive framework. Its primary purpose is to stimulate discussion and guide future empirical testing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tanvir Ferdous (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: