In-vitro analysis reveals that calcium silicate-based materials cause different tooth discoloration outcomes in molar repairs, indicating suitability of some materials for aesthetic concerns.
This study aimed to compare the effects of four calcium-silicate-based materials (Biodentine, Bio-C Repair, EndoCem MTA Premixed, NeoPutty) on tooth colour change in perforation repair to identify the most suitable option for aesthetically critical areas. Eighty five extracted two-rooted mandibular molars were used. Roots were sectioned 2 mm below the furcation, access cavities prepared, and buccal dentin thickness standardized to 2.5–3 mm. A 1.4 mm furcal perforation was then created in each sample. The control group ( n = 5) received no repair material, while the experimental groups ( n = 20; groups 1–4) were treated with Biodentine, Bio-C Repair, EndoCem MTA Premixed and NeoPutty, respectively. Colour was assessed with a spectrophotometer at baseline, 1 week, 1, 3, 6 months. ΔE and ΔL values were analyzed using One-Way ANOVA followed by the Tukey’s test ( p < 0.005). At 3 and 6 months, ΔE values of Group 3 (EndoCem MTA Premixed) and Group 4 (NeoPutty) were significantly higher than those of Group 1 (Biodentine) and the control group ( p < 0.005). CIEDE2000 ΔE00 analyses confirmed that Groups 3 (EndoCem MTA Premixed) and 4 (NeoPutty) caused a significantly greater color change across all time periods compared to other groups. Biodentine and Bio-C Repair caused significantly less staining than EndoCem MTA Premixed and NeoPutty, making them more suitable options for perforation repair in aesthetically critical areas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zırhlı et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: