PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 2026BioScience2 citationsOpen Access

Biology Needs Philosophy, But What Philosophy?

View Full Paper
JDJames DiFriscoSOSteven Hecht Orzack

Key Points

  • This work aims to explore the intersection of philosophy and biology to enhance scientific reasoning.
  • Discusses the current gap in awareness between biologists and philosophers.
  • Offers guidelines for biologists to engage with philosophy.
  • Provides recommendations for philosophers to understand biological concepts.
  • Identifies the potential improvements in scientific reasoning through collaboration.
  • Highlights the need for changes in practice for effective engagement.
  • Suggests a new framework termed 'philosophical biology' to improve biological understanding.

Abstract

Abstract Philosophy of biology has the potential to contribute to biology by improving scientific reasoning. However, this potential is largely unrealized because of the lack of awareness by most biologists of what philosophy can offer, because of deficits of biological expertise among most philosophers, and because of adherence to disciplinary norms in philosophy that render much work in philosophy of biology irrelevant to biologists. We believe that philosophy of biology will contribute little to biology without a change of practice. We provide guidelines (“comments” sensu Slobodkin 1975, “commandments” sensu Kornberg 2000, 2003, Francis et al. 2007) for how biologists can better engage with philosophy and for how philosophers can better engage with biology so as to create a “philosophical biology” that improves our biological understanding.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

DiFrisco et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4b9eb18185d8a3980235bhttps://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biag016
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper