PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 2026Medical Science Monitor0 citationsOpen Access

Influence of Operative Techniques on Clinical and Laboratory Outcomes in Class II Resin-Based Composite Restorations: A Systematic Review

View Full Paper
BZBassam Naoraldean Zidane

Key Points

  • This review aims to assess how different operative techniques influence outcomes of Class II resin-based composite restorations.
  • Reviewed 21 studies, including 11 randomized controlled trials and 10 in vitro investigations.
  • Evaluated adhesive protocols, layering strategies, matrix systems, and curing methods.
  • Assessed outcomes related to restoration longevity, marginal adaptation, postoperative sensitivity, and secondary caries.
  • Multi-step adhesives showed up to 91% survival at 5 years with lower secondary caries rates.
  • Incremental layering decreased postoperative sensitivity and enhanced marginal adaptation.
  • Sectional matrices achieved tighter proximal contacts with 76% success compared to 42%.
  • Soft-start curing reduced marginal gaps significantly from 112 m to 45 m.
  • One-step adhesives and uncontrolled bulk-fill placements resulted in higher failure rates and hypersensitivity.

Abstract

Background:Operative technique is a major determinant of the long-term success of Class II resin-based composite restorations.Variations in adhesive strategy, layering approach, matrix system, and curing protocol influence marginal integrity, polymerization stress, postoperative sensitivity, and secondary caries.Because resin-based composite placement is technique-sensitive, synthesizing evidence on how specific operative steps affect outcomes is essential.This systematic review evaluated the influence of operative techniques on the clinical and laboratory performance of Class II resin-based composite restorations. Material/Methods:A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase identified 57 records.After duplicate removal and screening, 21 studies were included (11 randomized controlled trials and 10 in vitro investigations).Techniques assessed were adhesive protocols, layering strategies, matrix systems, and curing methods.Data extraction focused on restoration longevity, marginal adaptation, postoperative sensitivity, and secondary caries.Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane tool for randomized trials and modified CONSORT/Joanna Briggs Institute criteria for in vitro studies.Meta-analysis was not feasible because of heterogeneity. Results:Multi-step adhesive approaches showed the highest 5-year survival (up to 91%) and lower secondary caries rates.Incremental layering reduced postoperative sensitivity and improved marginal adaptation.Sectional matrices produced tighter proximal contacts (76% vs 42%), while soft-start curing reduced marginal gap formation (112 m to 45 m).One-step adhesives and uncontrolled bulk-fill placement showed higher failure and hypersensitivity. Conclusions:Multi-step adhesives, incremental layering, sectional matrices, and soft-start curing provide the most favorable outcomes and support technique standardization in clinical practice.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bassam Naoraldean Zidane (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4ba0818185d8a3980268chttps://doi.org/10.12659/msm.951980
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Clinical Performance of Bulk‐Fill Versus Incremental Layering Techniques in Class II Restorations: A Systematic Review and Network Meta‐Analysis2025 · 1 citations
  2. 2Clinical Performance of Bulk‐Fill Versus Incremental Composite Placement Approaches in Vital Posterior Teeth: A 24 Months Randomized Controlled Trial2026
  3. 3Influence of composite resin type and curing method on the fracture resistance of class II restorations: An in vitro comparison2025
  4. 4Matrix Band Systems in Class II Composites: A Systematic Review2026 · 2 citations
  5. 5Effectiveness of adhesive strategies for direct posterior composite restorations in permanent teeth: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis2026