Systematic review finds CAIRS implantation improves vision in keratoconus, suggesting effective surgical options.
Background and Objectives: Corneal allogeneic intrastromal ring segments (CAIRS) are designed to decrease and stabilize the extent of corneal ectasia in keratoconus patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the effectiveness of different surgical techniques for CAIRS preparation and the adjunctive use of corneal cross-linking. Materials and Methods: Following the PRISMA statement and checklist, a comprehensive search was conducted in Embase, Medline, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, through the use of a systematic search approach in accordance with the Cochrane Collaboration guidelines. Results: Eighteen studies, involving 567 eyes of 459 patients, met the inclusion criteria. At one month postoperatively, CAIRS implantation significantly improved uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) (−0.45 logMAR, 95% CI [−0.59 to −0.31], p < 0.001) and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (−0.36 logMAR, 95% CI [−0.46 to −0.25], p < 0.001). These improvements remained significant after one year (UCVA: −0.39 logMAR, 95% CI [−0.48 to −0.30], p < 0.001; BCVA: −0.34 logMAR, 95% CI [−0.50 to −0.18], p < 0.001). Similarly, mean simulated keratometry (Kmean) decreased by −4.42 D (95% CI [−5.94 to −2.90], p < 0.001) and maximum keratometry (Kmax) by −3.88 D (95% CI [−6.71 to −1.05], p < 0.001) at one month, with sustained reductions at one year (−3.59 D, 95% CI [−4.35 to −2.84], p < 0.001 and −3.73 D, 95% CI [−4.91 to −2.55], p < 0.001). No significant differences in surgical outcome have been observed between the different surgical techniques. Conclusions: CAIRS implantation appears to be an effective treatment option for keratoconus, regardless of the technique used for segment preparation or the addition of corneal cross-linking. No approach demonstrated clear clinical superiority over others in the first year after surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clerck et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: