Comprehensive analysis illustrates scalability and privacy trade-offs in public blockchains, highlighting zero-knowledge proofs and benchmarking.
: Public blockchains enable decentralized applications but continue to face persistent challenges in scalability, privacy, and decentralization. This survey employs a structured and comprehensive literature review of 114 peer-reviewed studies and reputable technical reports (2018–2025), selected using predefined search strings, inclusion/exclusion criteria, and a structured screening process, documented using a Literature selection flow diagram. Scalability techniques—including sharding, Layer 2 architectures (e.g., ZK-Rollups, Optimistic Rollups, commit chains), and privacy-enhancing technologies such as zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs), trusted execution environments (TEEs), and protocol-native mixers—are critically analyzed. Standardized benchmarking evaluates throughput, latency, gas efficiency, and decentralization under consistent test conditions. A key contribution of this study is the first integrated, datadriven assessment of privacy–scalability trade-offs within the blockchain scalability trilemma framework. Empirical benchmarking indicates, for example, that zkSync Era demonstrates a theoretical throughput of ~2000 TPS but achieves ~0.52 TPS under measured network conditions, highlighting the computational overhead of ZKP generation. Hybrid architectures—such as zkPorter’s off-chain data availability combined with ZKPs or TEE-based routing— consistently outperform single-layer approaches in balancing performance, confidentiality, and trustlessness. Post-2021 advancements, including modular rollups, MEV-resistant sharding, and machine-learning-based load prediction, are reviewed alongside open challenges in standardized benchmarking, post-quantum privacy systems, and compliance-aware PETs. Future research directions emphasize cross-layer designs integrating ZKPs, dynamic sharding, and regulatory- ready privacy protocols to enable secure, scalable, and legally compliant blockchain ecosystems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akraminasab et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: