The manner of death is traditionally defined in the literature as the way in which an injury or disease occurred and produced a fatal physiological derangement in the body. However, in real-world practice, determining the manner of death is seldom straightforward or algorithmic. Autopsy surgeons often face significant challenges, especially when postmortem findings can simulate multiple possible causes of death, leading to considerable divergence from the theoretical framework. This dilemma becomes even more pronounced in cases where the body has been subjected to fire, further obscuring the interpretative process. We have discussed here the findings of postmortem examination of three cases in which the manner of death was investigated thoroughly by the authors. The manner of death, as determined through a logical and scientific autopsy, was found to be contrary to that considered by the investigating authorities. The significance of crime scene investigation and findings of thorough postmortem examination enabled the autopsy surgeons to comment on the possibility of the manner of death.
Kumar et al. (Wed,) studied this question.