Electrocatalytic performance of a new 1D Pd-MOF electrode improves urea oxidation in alkaline media, suggesting promising applications.
Urea is widely recognized as a promising energy source due to its abundance in the environment. Its electrooxidation offers a sustainable pathway for hydrogen generation and wastewater treatment. In this work, a nano-sized one-dimensional palladium metal-organic framework (1D Pd-MOF) was synthesized via a chemical route and drop-cast onto nickel foam (NF), serving as an efficient catalyst promoter for the electrooxidation of urea. The fabricated electrodes were characterized using SEM coupled with EDX and elemental mapping, ICP-OES, XRD, and XPS. Electrochemical evaluations revealed a substantial enhancement in urea oxidation current density, achieving 43 mA cm −2 on the 1D Pd-MOF/NF electrode, compared to 10 mA cm −2 on bare NF. Repeated cyclic voltammetry and chronoamperometry tests confirmed the enhanced stability of the 1D Pd-MOF/NF electrode under operating conditions. Furthermore, the heterogeneous rate constant for urea oxidation was significantly higher on the 1D Pd-MOF/NF electrode (1.73 × 10 5 mol −1 cm 3 s −1 ) than on NF (2.5 × 10 4 mol −1 cm 3 s −1 ). Anodic Tafel slope values of 136 and 113 mV dec −1 for NF and 1D Pd-MOF/NF, respectively, indicate facile urea oxidation at the 1D Pd-MOF/NF electrode. However, the significantly lower charge-transfer resistance of 1.84 Ω cm 2 on the 1D Pd-MOF/NF electrode highlights its superior charge-transfer kinetics and overall electrocatalytic performance for urea oxidation. The CV and EIS results indicate that urea electrooxidation proceeds via a mixed kinetic mechanism, involving both surface-confined and diffusion-controlled processes. • Nano-sized 1D Pd-MOF catalyst was successfully synthesized and supported on nickel foam. • The 1D Pd-MOF/NF electrode showed higher activity and stability compared to bare NF. • The modified electrode exhibited faster electron transfer and better catalytic performance compared to NF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ismail et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: