Many-objective multi-task optimization enhances scheduling efficiency in complex manufacturing scenarios, suggesting better production outcomes.
• We proposed a many-objective multi-task model to address complex scheduling scenarios. • We propose an MTMOEA-LB to enhance knowledge transfer efficiency under task similarity. • Conduct scenario simulations and experiments using real-world data to highlight innovative. With the continuous development of industrial manufacturing, rationally scheduling multiple-source flexible orders is crucial for achieving sustainable production. However, most existing methods adopt a single-task optimization paradigm with independent modeling, overlooking the similarities among multi-source orders and the correlations between scheduling optimizations. This leads to additional waste of computational resources and the loss of prior experience. To address this issue, we propose a many-objective multi-task optimization paradigm that takes into account the correlations among multi-source flexible orders. Specifically, through the multi-task optimization paradigm, multiple flexible orders with different variable dimensions are uniformly modeled by sharing a set of objective functions, thereby enabling the joint optimization of related scheduling tasks. Secondly, to investigate the impact of tool wear on scheduling performance, an exponential function-based tool wear coefficient is introduced, and a many-objective optimization model is constructed that considers indicators such as processing time, energy consumption, load balancing, and tool wear amount. Next, considering the discrete problem properties, a many-objective multi-task evolutionary algorithm based on load balancing (MTMOEA-LB) is designed to avoid premature convergence of the multi-task optimization algorithm due to task differences. Finally, the actual production order data set of a flange enterprise is used for experimental comparison. Experimental results indicate that the proposed algorithm can output high-quality scheduling schemes quickly and effectively compared with other advanced optimization algorithms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: