Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prospective cohort study investigates PAI-1 levels in pediatric epilepsy, highlighting its role in predicting treatment outcomes.
Purpose: To investigate the clinical relevance of plasma plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) in pediatric epilepsy, focusing on its associations with seizure severities and therapeutic outcomes. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study to compare the plasma PAI-1 levels quantified by ELISA across children with active epilepsy, seizure-free patients, and healthy controls. Furthermore, subgroup analyses were conducted to assess the impact of AED treatment or long-term drug response to the plasma PAI-1 levels. Results: PAI-1 levels were 2.1-fold higher in the seizure group than in the control group ( p < 0.0001), and 1.3-fold higher than in remission patients ( p < 0.0001). No significant difference was observed between the anti-epileptic drug-treated and untreated subgroups ( p = 0.0689). Baseline PAI-1 levels predicted 12-month pharmaco-responses, with pharmaco-resistant patients showing 12% higher PAI-1 concentrations than responders ( p = 0.0234). Conclusion: Our findings establish plasma PAI-1 as a promising biomarker for identifying children at high risk for pharmaco-resistant epilepsy, thereby addressing a high-burden condition. The persistence of PAI-1 elevation hints at underlying inflammatory or synaptic pathologies that may be novel therapeutic targets beyond conventional AEDs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xiao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: