This method enhances seismic impedance inversion in geological data, suggesting improved precision and reduced data reliance.
Deep-learning-based seismic impedance inversion methods have received wide attention due to their ability to handle nonlinear mapping problems. The conventional deep-learning-based seismic impedance inversion methods have the problem of an overwhelming dependence on labeled data, which results in a decrease in the model’s ability to extract local features and poor precision of inversion results when training data is insufficient. To address these issues, a new atrous spatial pyramid pooling and U-Net (ASPP-UNet) based seismic impedance inversion method is proposed. The multi-scale feature extraction ability of U-Net is enhanced by the pyramid pooling operation. Based on this, the training datasets were constructed using seismic data and a small amount of well-logging data. To verify the effectiveness of the proposed method, we conducted two simulation experiments on the Marmousi2 and SEAM public datasets and compared the results with those of CNN, U-Net, and Attention-UNet under the same experimental conditions. The experimental results show that, under the same experimental conditions, the single-trace impedance inversion produced by the proposed method contains richer high-frequency details, and the inverted impedance profile displays smooth vertical continuity between layers and at fault locations. The inversion results also depend less on labeled data and exhibit the least information loss at positions far from the training wells, which is reflected in the strong lateral continuity between traces in the inverted impedance profile. Compared with the comparison methods, the ASPP-UNet inversion results show the best statistical indicators. To further validate the applicability of the ASPP-UNet method, it was applied to real seismic impedance inversion data from East Sichuan Province. The impedance profile obtained by ASPP-UNet is consistent with the actual geological structure. Compared with the three deep-learning methods mentioned above, the inversion results have the highest accuracy, and the impedance profile error is the smallest.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yue et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: