Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cluster analysis identifies distinct mobility phenotypes in pre-operative knee osteoarthritis patients, suggesting targeted interventions.
Background: Mobility assessment in knee osteoarthritis spans perception (patient-reported outcomes), capacity (in-clinic performance), and performance (free-living behaviour).By integrating all three domains, this study explored emerging pre-operative mobility phenotypes.Methods: Fifty-six patients awaiting knee arthroplasty completed patient-reported measures (Oxford Knee Score (OKS), quality of life (EQ-5D)), in-clinic testing with markerless motion capture (60-s preferred-pace and, in a subset, 30-s fast-paced walk and five-repetition sit-tostand), and seven days of free-living monitoring with shank-mounted inertial sensors (steps, sedentary time, stride time).Hierarchical clustering was applied to standardized features in two models: Model 1 (n=56; in-clinic preferred-pace walk) and Model 2 (n=37; included in-clinic fast-pace walk and sit-to-stand time).Principal component scores (PCs) described knee kinematics.An exploratory tertile transition analysis tracked cross-domain consistency.Findings: Both models yielded two phenotypes: a smaller low-functioning group and a larger higher-functioning group.The low-functioning group had higher body mass index and more females, worse self-reported function and quality of life (OKS, EQ5D), slower in-clinic gait, and lower free-living activity (fewer daily steps, greater sedentary time) with slower gait (longer stride time).The PCs revealed reduced knee flexion magnitude and range of motion, as well as a varus-thrust-like pattern in the low-functioning group.Within the higher-functioning group, only 11-15% of patients remained in the same tertile across domains. Interpretation:The unified mobility assessment identified two distinct pre-operative mobility phenotypes with substantial cross-domain heterogeneity among higher-functioning patients.The implications of this assessment approach may support domain-specific interventions to personalize care and potentially improve recovery after knee arthroplasty.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bacco et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: