Assesses microplastic contamination in coastal sediments, revealing high-risk tourism hotspots and highlighting management needs.
Microplastic (MP) contamination in coastal sediments poses growing ecological and human health concerns, yet data for developing nations remain limited. This study provides a comprehensive assessment of MPs along the Cox's Bazar shoreline, the world's longest natural sea beach and a rapidly expanding tourism hub in Bangladesh. Tourism-dominated beaches showed significantly higher abundances (up to 111 items kg⁻¹ dw) compared to rural low-use sites, with fibres and fragments representing the dominant morphotypes. Polymer analysis identified polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP) as the most common constituents, reflecting consumer packaging waste and fishing-related debris as major sources. Risk evaluation demonstrated that abundance alone underestimates potential ecological hazard. Novel, hazard-weighted indices developed in this study, the Sediment Polymer Hazard Index (SPHI) and Microplastic Pollution Risk Index (MPRI), identified tourism hotspots as high-risk zones due to elevated contributions from toxic polymers (e.g., PS, PET) and ingestion-prone particle characteristics. Multivariate analyses further indicated that site-use category significantly constrain MP composition, confirming the influence of direct human pressure. Machine learning models, applied to classify MP contamination in coastal sediments, demonstrated that polymer-specific composition outperforms total abundance in predicting high-risk sites, with Random Forest achieving the highest classification accuracy. These results highlight the need for targeted coastal management prioritizing tourism-intensive zones, improved waste handling, and sustainable fishing practices. Integrating hazard-based indices and advanced predictive tools into long-term monitoring frameworks will be essential to protect the ecological and socioeconomic value of Cox's Bazar as coastal development accelerates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tajwar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: