Mixed methods study explores feedback experiences in Saudi medical schools, suggesting cultural adaptation is vital.
Purpose Even though there is extensive literature about good practice in feedback, it is currently unclear how to sustain a good quality feedback experience in a problem-based learning (PBL) curriculum. This research aims to explore students’ and tutors’ experiences of the feedback process in a PBL curriculum in the local context of Saudi medical schools, and to identify factors that influence perceived feedback quality. Method A mixed methods approach was adopted. First, 856 students from six medical schools completed a survey, followed by 12 student focus groups and 11 tutor semi-structured interviews across four schools. Results Verbal feedback was reported to be the most effective. Communicating feedback in the students’ native language and students’ previous experiences of teacher-centred education in secondary school were key factors affecting feedback experiences. Most student and tutor participants believed that feedback in PBL was for promoting studentcentred and self-directed learning (SDL); however, these groups differed in their perceptions of what was good feedback practice in facilitating self-directed learning. Conclusion Even though most student participants received feedback, their experience was variable, and the quality was inconsistent. Learner and tutor characteristics and beliefs impacted on the feedback process. A data informed model was developed to summarise key factors that influence feedback quality in a PBL curriculum in Saudi Arabian Medical Schools. A key recommendation is appropriate cultural adaptation of the feedback in a PBL curriculum when implemented in different global contexts. Specific recommendations for Saudi-medical schools include incorporating staff development to address best practice in facilitating self-directed learning and where practical tutor feedback given in person using the student’s native language.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alomair et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: