Genome-wide analysis uncovers cuticular protein gene families in honeybees, suggesting roles in cuticle formation.
Cuticular proteins (CPs)—key components of the insect exoskeleton—not only regulate development but also serve as structural barriers that enhance resistance against environmental stressors. This study identified CP gene families in Apis mellifera and analyzed their expression patterns during the worker capped brood development stages from mature larva to pre-eclosion. Using a comprehensive genome-wide bioinformatic approach, we identified 85 CP genes in A. mellifera which comprise six families: CPR (n = 43), CPAPs (n = 27), CPF (n = 2), Tweedle (n = 2), CPLCP (n = 8) and Apidermin (n = 3). Analysis of CP gene evolutionary relationship revealed that each CP family forms a distinct, relatively independent clade. Domain and motif analyses confirmed that all CPR members harbor a conserved Chitin_Bind_4 domain, consistent with CPR family structures in other taxa. Additionally, CPAP members possess one or three Chitin-binding Peritrophin-A domain (CBM_14), CPF members possess a conserved Pupal cuticle protein C1 domain (Cuticle_3), and Tweedle members contain a conserved domain of unknown function (DUF243). In addition, the analysis found no conserved domain within the CPLCP and Apidermin families. RNA-seq data revealed dynamic expression patterns of AmCPs during pupal development, with each gene family displaying a relatively characteristic temporal profile. Quantitative PCR validation of eight highly expressed CPR genes at 9 days post-capping confirmed the RNA-seq results. This work provides a comprehensive bioinformatic characterization and transcriptional analysis of CP genes in A. mellifera, offering a foundation for future functional studies on cuticle formation and identifying candidate genes potentially involved in cuticle development in honeybees. This work relies on transcriptomic data and in silico analyses. All proposed biological roles are hypothetical and require experimental validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: