PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 2026Humanities and Social Sciences Communications10 citationsOpen Access

Generative AI technologies and educational outcomes: a comprehensive meta-analysis comparing traditional and AI-driven approaches

YDYing Dong

Key Points

  • This research addresses the impact of generative AI technologies on educational outcomes compared to traditional methods.
  • Conducted a PRISMA-based meta-analysis and systematic review of existing studies.
  • Analyzed the effectiveness of generative AI in strengthening academic achievements, higher-order thinking, and writing skills.
  • Performed subgroup analyses based on regions and educational interventions.
  • Generative AI technologies generally outperform traditional approaches in educational outcomes.
  • Significant improvements noted in academic achievement, higher-order thinking abilities, and writing skills.
  • Generative AI feedback yielded superior results compared to non-GenAI-assisted methods.

Abstract

With the exponentially rapid development of information technologies, generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) technologies have been widely applied to various fields, including education. However, few studies have synthesized the pooled effect of GenAI on educational outcomes, which is an important research gap this study aims to address. Through the PRISMA-based meta-analysis and systematic review, this study concludes a central finding: GenAI technologies may generally outperform traditional and non-GenAI educational approaches in the improvement of educational outcomes, especially strengthening academic achievements, higher-order thinking abilities, and writing skills more effectively than non-GenAI-assisted approaches, with GenAI feedback yielding superior results as well. Although subgroup analyses regarding countries and different interventions have identified nuanced findings, the core value of the current study lies in the evidence-based, unified assessment of GenAI’s role in education, which possibly enables stakeholders to optimize AI-integrated educational strategies, effectively guides researchers to prioritize meaningful areas for further exploration, and efficiently equips policymakers to make informed decisions in educational practice. Future researchers should delve into the impact of GenAI technologies on students with disabilities and design personalized teaching strategies tailored to their needs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ying Dong (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4fbd5b39f7826a300c44dhttps://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-06903-y
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Poietic symbiosis or algorithmic subjugation: generative AI technology in marketing communications education2024 · 20 citations
  2. 2Potentials and Implications of ChatGPT for ESL Writing Instruction2024 · 23 citations
  3. 3Augmented reality technology in language learning: A meta-analysis2024 · 14 citations
  4. 4ChatGPT effects on cognitive skills of undergraduate students: Receiving instant responses from AI-based conversational large language models (LLMs)2023 · 276 citations
  5. 5Academic achievement2019 · 41 citations