Logistic regression analyzes treatment patterns, showing hormonal differences affect survival in EPM.
Background Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is central to treating patients with epithelioid peritoneal mesothelioma (EPM). Male sex is a negative prognostic factor in mesothelioma, but the reasons for this remain unclear. We evaluated the impact of sex and age, as a proxy for menopause status, on treatment patterns and survival for EPM. Patients and Methods Adults with unicavitary EPM were identified in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) (2006–2020). Predictors of CRS/HIPEC receipt were evaluated using logistic regression. Among patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC, variables impacting overall survival (OS) were evaluated using Cox regression. Patients were stratified by age (≤ 40 years and ≥ 60 years) into younger male, older male, premenopausal female, and postmenopausal female patients for subgroup analysis. Results Of 1868 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 28.1% ( n = 526) received CRS/HIPEC; of those, 286 (54.4%) were male. Male sex (odds ratio, OR 1.054, p = 0.015), younger age (OR 0.996, p < 0.001), and treatment at an academic center (OR 1.253, p < 0.001) were independently associated with receiving CRS/HIPEC. Males had worse OS than females after CRS/HIPEC on multivariable regression (hazard ratio, HR 1.647, p = 0.003). Upon age-stratification of patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC, premenopausal females had significantly improved OS compared with younger male, older male, and postmenopausal female patients on Kaplan–Meier analysis (all p < 0.05). Female sex significantly predicted survival in younger (HR 0.267, p = 0.012) but not older patients (HR 0.676, p = 0.061). Conclusions Premenopausal women with EPM undergoing CRS/HIPEC had significantly improved OS compared with both males and postmenopausal females, suggesting a hormonal influence on outcomes. Future studies to elucidate the biological mechanisms underlying this sex-based disparity are necessary.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cummins et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: