Ethnographic research reveals how welfare practices create conflicting citizenship pressures for youth in disadvantaged areas, suggesting implications for social support systems.
Sociologists have long observed that living in a disadvantaged neighbourhood commonly means facing a moral and practical dilemma; the place one calls home is both good and bad, as it is a source of both support and social suffering. Based on five years of ethnographic research in a marginalised neighbourhood of Helsinki, I demonstrate how welfare professionals, in their efforts to mould local youth into ideal (middle-class) citizens, inadvertently reproduce this cross-pressure. Welfare professionals expect young people to be(come) both communitarian citizens rooted in their ‘home area’ and entrepreneurial citizens capable of leaving the ‘risk environment’, translating the current ideals of good citizenship into everday practices. The article argues that the simultaneous enactment of citizenship ideals that directly oppose each other increases the cross-pressure that young people experience, thereby contributing to their marginalised position.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lotta Junnilainen (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: