Retrospective analysis evaluates complications and quality of life in patients with stents for tumors, indicating significant implications for treatment outcomes.
Introduction: Double stenting of esophagus and airways can be used for the palliative treatment of advanced tracheo-esophageal tumors. Aim: Evaluate complications and quality of life of patients treated with esophageal stent (OS) and tracheobronchial stent (TS). Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients treated with OS and TS at the Rouen University Hospital between 1997 and 2010. Results: Among 326 patients treated with OS, 33 received TS. Primary tumor was esophageal for 26 patients, pulmonary for 6 and both esophageal and pulmonary for one. 17 TS were placed for oeso-bronchial fistula, 5 for bronchial obstruction and 4 for both. Median Olgivie's dysphagia score was 4/4 before OS and 1 after. TS reduced dyspnea and eating cough in all cases except 3 (2 persistant fistula – 1 persistant dyspnea). Median survival after second stent insertion was 84 days. Hospitalization free median survival after second stent insertion was 42,5 days corresponding to 51% of survival. Lung cancer patients had shorter median survival than esophageal cancer patients 75 vs. 57 days. Early severe complications were 2 massive hemoptysis, 2 septic chock and 1 vocal chord paralysis. Complications occurring after 10 days of stenting were 3 hematemesis, 2 massive hemoptysis, 3 oeso-respiratory fistula, 1 septic chock and 1 tracheal compression. Mild early complications occurred for 11 patients including thoracic pain in 3 patients and 2 minor hemoptysis. Mild late complications occurred for 32 patients including 14 TS infections, 7 pneumonias and 6 alimentary obstructions of OS. Conclusion: OS and TS for advanced tracheo-esophageal tumors are associated with frequent infectious complications but improves patients' quality of life.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patout et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: