Experimental modeling enhances trajectory prediction accuracy for unmanned surface vehicles, indicating improved navigational efficiency and sustainability.
As the maritime industry transitions towards green shipping, operational sustainability and energy efficiency are increasingly crucial for long-endurance Unmanned Surface Vehicle (USV) missions. To this end, proactively adjusting driving strategies based on the prediction of other USVs’ motion is essential. This proactive approach directly minimizes carbon emissions and reduces high-energy driving behaviors resulting from passive sudden braking or sharp turns in unexpected situations. However, existing trajectory prediction methods are trained based on low-frequency automatic identification system data of large merchant vessels, which cannot be directly used on the highly dynamic USV data. To address this limitation, this study constructs a large-scale simulated USV scenario dataset grounded in nonlinear ship hydrodynamics, which contains complicated interactive scenarios with multiple USV agents. To effectively model the interaction among agents for accurate prediction, we further propose USV-Former, a hierarchical encoder-decoder architecture designed for proactive navigation. The framework integrates a symmetric encoding structure with a dual-stage pipeline: a Local Attention Module captures high-frequency dynamics, while a Global Graph Attention Module enforces COLREGs-compliant topological constraints. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed model outperforms established baselines in prediction accuracy. Qualitative analysis further reveals that by accurately anticipating target intentions, the model minimizes unnecessary avoidance maneuvers, enabling more stable and momentum-conserving velocity profiles. Ultimately, this architecture exhibits high computational efficiency, reduces operational energy waste, and provides a robust, measurable algorithmic foundation for green autonomous shipping and marine environmental protection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cui et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: