Mixed-methods study examines how prosody shapes comprehension in advanced Arabic L2 learners, suggesting teaching improvements.
This study investigates how prosodic parameters – speech rate, pausing, intonation contour, pitch range (F0 span), and monotony – shape listening comprehension among advanced learners of Arabic (CEFR B2–C1). Drawing on triangulated evidence from semi-structured instructor interviews ( n = 6), a learner survey ( n = 52), and a curriculum-embedded audit of textbook audio, the analysis integrates exploratory inferential statistics with acoustic-phonetic profiling in Praat (words-per-minute, pause metrics, F0 range, intensity). Convergent results identify fast, weakly segmented speech as the principal barrier to comprehension, with flattened or atypical intonation attenuating discourse-pragmatic signalling that listeners rely on for parsing and prediction. Relative to widely reported EAP benchmarks, the Arabic instructional materials examined exhibit slower delivery and narrower F0 spans, a pattern that risks limited ecological validity and potential under-preparation for authentic input. The findings refine bottom-up/top-down accounts and cognitive-load explanations by demonstrating that prosodic chunking – via tempo and temporal segmentation – mediates processing even at advanced proficiency. Pedagogically, the study motivates staged exposure to authentic-speed Arabic, explicit prosody-for-listening instruction (e.g. guided shadowing, cue tracking, and pause-aware transcription), and CEFR-aligned assessment targeting prosodic inference. Acoustic and statistical patterns jointly foreground speed and pausing as high-impact levers for instruction and materials design in Arabic second language (L2) listening.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Djemai Mahmoud Boulaares (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: