This article reveals a new Mental Health Score integrating clinical assessments and mood data for improved mental wellness tracking and clinical decision support.
Mental health monitoring in digital health applications is commonly fragmented across multiple validated instruments, each capturing a distinct clinical dimension in isolation. This paper introduces the Mental Health Score (MHS), a novel composite wellness metric scaled 0–1000 that integrates three validated clinical assessments — the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), and the Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) — with ecological momentary assessment (EMA) data in the form of daily mood check-ins. The MHS provides a single, interpretable, longitudinally comparable indicator of overall mental wellness. A fixed weighting schema assigns 200 points to each clinical instrument and 400 points to the mood component, with all inputs normalised to a common 0–1 scale prior to aggregation. Temporal tracking is supported via historical score persistence, enabling within-person comparison across time. A dual-ring circular gauge visualisation presents the current and previous scores simultaneously, accompanied by a percentage-change indicator. The MHS system is designed for both self-monitoring and clinical oversight contexts, including a professional dashboard supporting patient-level monitoring with consent-gated data access. This article describes the theoretical basis, computational specification, software architecture, and user-interface design of the MHS, and discusses its potential applications in digital mental health monitoring, clinical decision support, and population-level wellness research.ResearchGate: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/401942301
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yampolski et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: