PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 15, 2026Toxics0 citationsOpen Access

Impacts of Mislabeled ECIG Liquids on Primary Particulate Matter Emissions

View Full Paper
SFSarah FresquezVSVijay SivaramanYSYogesh Saini

Key Points

  • This research investigates how mislabeled electronic cigarette liquids affect particulate matter emissions.
  • Analyzed 20 flavor-free ECIG liquid samples with varying nicotine concentrations and PG/VG ratios.
  • Measured chemical content using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.
  • Generated aerosols in a controlled exposure chamber and measured PM2.5 emissions.
  • Widespread labeling inaccuracies found: 'nicotine-free' samples contained trace nicotine levels.
  • 70% of samples had incorrect PG/VG ratios, with higher VG content observed.
  • Higher VG content consistently increased PM2.5 mass.

Abstract

Electronic cigarette (ECIG) liquids are marketed with labeled nicotine concentrations and propylene glycol (PG) to vegetable glycerin (VG) ratios, yet quality control inconsistencies may alter vaping emissions. We quantified discrepancies between labeled and measured chemical content and evaluated how these differences affect emissions of particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 µm or smaller (PM2.5). Flavor-free liquids (n = 20) spanning nicotine labels of 0, 9, 18, and 48 mg/mL and PG content from 0% to 80% were purchased. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy measured nicotine, PG, and VG. Aerosols were generated using a standardized device in a controlled exposure chamber. PM2.5 was measured using a pDR-1500 and SMPS/APS, with gravimetric correction factors calculated. Labeling inaccuracies were widespread: “nicotine-free” liquids contained 0.1 to 0.4 mg/mL nicotine, and labeled nicotine deviated by up to ±30%. PG/VG ratios were frequently incorrect; 70% of samples contained higher VG than labeled, including “100% VG” products with about 10% PG. Higher VG consistently increased PM2.5 mass, while nicotine had a minimal effect. The pDR overestimated mass, whereas SMPS/APS underestimated due to volatilization losses. Overall, inaccurate ECIG liquid labeling can alter measured PM2.5 emissions under controlled conditions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fresquez et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b5ff5c83145bc643d1bb3dhttps://doi.org/10.3390/toxics14030256
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper