Evaluates sensory and subjective effects of nicotine variations in adults who vape, suggesting formulation impact on user experience.
Significance: Sensory and subjective effects contribute to consumer response toward electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS). Evaluating the relative contributions of nicotine concentration, form (salt vs freebase), and carrier concentration (PG/VG ratio) is important to understanding why formulations may be more attractive. Methods: Participants were 78 adults (age ≥21) with no sensory deficits who used ENDS daily, randomized to one of two sub-studies. In Study A, 38 participants sampled tobacco-flavored e-liquids varying in PG/VG ratio (30/70, 60/40, 100/0) and nicotine concentration (0, 18, 36 mg/mL freebase). In Study B, 40 participants sampled e-liquids varying in nicotine form (salt, freebase) and concentration (0, 18, 36 mg/mL). Questionnaires assessed sensory and subjective effects. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) models examined the effects of experimental factors on these ratings. Results: Nicotine concentration was strongly related to a wide array of sensory and subjective effects measures, generally following a dose-response pattern. PG/VG showed relationships with a subset of hedonic effects independent of nicotine. There were no significant differences observed for sensory or subjective measures between salt versus freebase nicotine. Conclusions: Nicotine concentration showed consistent associations with sensory response to e-liquids when delivered in the same device. Sensory and behavioral responses to different e-liquid compositions may help contextualize ENDS usage patterns, risk perceptions, and behaviors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O’Connor et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: