Cross-sectional analysis shows screen time and sleep impact ADHD symptoms in university students, suggesting need for better sleep habits.
This cross-sectional study examined associations between social jetlag (SJL), screen exposure, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms in university students. A sample of 321 young adults (mean age = 20.9 years, SD = 2.3; 257 females) was surveyed to assess various behavioral and psychological variables. Measures included total screen time on both workdays (school days) and free days, pre-sleep screen time, SJL as determined by the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire, symptoms of ADHD using the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS v1.1), as well as mood and future hope. Spearman correlations showed ASRS scores were modestly associated with greater screen time (workday r = 0.154, p = 0.006; free day r = 0.218, p = 0.001), longer pre-sleep use (workday r = 0.139, p = 0.012; free day r = 0.164, p = 0.003), and greater SJL (r = 0.176, p = 0.002), and inversely related to future hope (r = -0.247, p = 0.001) and mood (r = -0.219, p = 0.001). In adjusted regressions, free day screen time (B = 0.68, p = 0.032) and SJL (B = 1.10, p = 0.054) were associated with higher ASRS; each 1-h increase in SJL corresponded to a 1.10-point increase (95% CI: -0.01 to 2.22). Greater self-reported sleep need (B = -0.87, p = 0.023), future hope (B = -0.66, p = 0.029), and mood (B = -0.87, p = 0.010) were associated with lower ASRS. Mediation analysis indicated that SJL partially mediated the association between free days pre-sleep screen time and ADHD symptoms (unstandardized indirect effect = 0.26, 95% CI 0.02-0.61). Findings suggest that heavier daily screen exposure and circadian misalignment are associated with greater ADHD-like symptoms and reduced future hope in emerging adults, underscoring potential benefits of regular sleep timing and moderated screen use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kurtaran et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: