Shows enhanced anti-corrosion performance in coatings from borate-modified cardanol, indicating superior thermosets through polymerization.
Cardanol (CD), derived from cashew nut shell liquid (CNSL), is a promising bio-based feedstock for sustainable polymer development due to its renewable origin, cost-effectiveness, and inherent functional versatility. In this study, a borate ester-functionalized cardanol, tris(3-((8Z,11Z)-pentadeca-8,11-dien-1-yl)-phenyl) boratetermed tricardanyl borate (TCB), was developed as a recyclable crosslinker for thiol−ene photo-curable thermoset coatings. Unlike conventional cardanol modifications that require harsh conditions and halogen substituents, TCB was synthesized via a solvent-free transesterification reaction, preserving the native unsaturation and functionality of cardanol. The blocked phenolic hydroxyl groups in TCB eliminated radical-quenching behavior, enabling efficient thiol−ene click polymerization. Thermosets prepared with varying thiol/ene ratios (BT-25, BT-50, BT-100) were compared to reference networks based on unmodified cardanol (CT-25, CT-50, CT-100). Thermal analysis revealed that TCB-based networks exhibited higher glass transition temperatures and char yields, attributed to increased crosslinking density and boron oxide formation. Anti-corrosion performance was evaluated via salt spray testing, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), and potentiodynamic polarization (PDP). BT-50, formulated with an equimolar thiol/ene ratio, exhibited the highest low-frequency impedance (2.9 MΩ cm2), indicating superior barrier performance on galvanized steel. Recyclability was demonstrated by alkaline degradation of BT-50, yielding thioether-functionalized cardanol and free phenolic groups, as confirmed by 1H NMR. These results highlight the multifunctional role of TCB in enabling robust, photo-curable, and recyclable thermosets, reinforcing its potential in sustainable material design aligned with green chemistry and circular economy principles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: