Action research finds increased access to justice in Mauritius with traditional dispute resolution, suggesting further government support for accreditation.
Traditional dispute resolution mechanisms have been integral to resolving conflicts in Mauritius for centuries, reflecting a blend of indigenous and colonial legal traditions. An action research approach was employed, involving semi-structured interviews with community leaders, focus group discussions with TDRM practitioners, and participatory observation of mediation sessions. Data were analysed using thematic content analysis. TDRM engagement significantly increased by 25% among communities previously underrepresented in formal legal systems, particularly in rural areas where access to justice is more challenging. Traditional dispute resolution mechanisms play a critical role in enhancing accessibility and inclusivity of justice for marginalized Mauritian populations. Government initiatives should support the expansion and accreditation of TDRM processes to ensure they align with modern legal standards and uphold equitable outcomes. traditional dispute resolution, access to justice, Mauritius, action research
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beth Holmes (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: