Comparative legal analysis reveals gaps in legal frameworks for parliamentary conduct in Jordan, indicating a need for reform.
This study, titled “The Essence of Regulating the Parliamentary Conduct: a Comparative Study”, examines the term of parliamentary conduct, its definition, as well as its differentiation from other concepts, and listing the legal frameworks governing it. Thus, the study is examined, in two articles, the essence of regulating the parliamentary conduct: "The concept of a parliamentary code of conduct" in the first section, and the principles and criteria of parliamentary conduct, in the second section thereof. The study followed a comparative legal analysis approach to examine the problem of the study on core; the parliamentary conduct, its principles and criteria that promote such conduct, and reached a number of results; the most important of which are the failure of the Jordanian legislator to recognize this essence, which made the parliamentary code of conduct lose its core.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dorsaf et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: