Collaborative ethnography reveals how gatekeeping impacts editorial practice in applied linguistics journals, highlighting interconnected identities.
Editors are often cast as gatekeepers who police the boundaries of knowledge. Yet in non‐Anglophone settings, editorial practice is also translational, relational and identity‐forming. We present a collaborative ethnography by a three‐member authorship team, including two women and one man, who simultaneously served in editorial roles across international, English‐medium journals in English as a foreign language (EFL)/applied linguistics. Drawing on fieldnotes, decision letters, reviewer exchanges, platform logs and reflexive journals, we theorise editorial brokerage: the day‐to‐day mediations through which editors translate standards across epistemic traditions, mobilise networks to calibrate judgement and negotiate role/time frictions within teaching‐intensive institutions. We integrate sociocultural theory and communities of practice to propose the Editorial Brokerage Cycle: linking tensions, mediations, identity work and outcomes. Findings are organised as five ethnographic vignettes, including decision letters as pedagogical genre, epistemic translation, reviewer ecologies, temporal/role frictions and becoming an editor. Each ends with a micro‐proposition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Le et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: