Experimental evaluation of pre-training treatment impacts on NiTi SMA bars during cyclic loading, suggesting limited necessity for optimal performance.
Shape memory alloys (SMAs) have been applied in seismic engineering due to their superior self-centering and remarkable energy dissipation capacity. However, research on the mechanical performance of SMA bars under cyclic tension-compression loading in confined concrete conditions remains limited, particularly with regard to the influence of pre-training. To evaluate the effects of different pre-training strain amplitudes, loading protocols, and the presence or absence of pre-training treatment on the key mechanical behaviors of SMA bars, five NiTi alloy bars with a dog-bone shape were designed in this study. The mechanical behaviors including martensitic transformation starting stress, secant stiffness, residual strain, and energy dissipation capacity were analyzed and compared. A comparative analysis of the microstructural morphology of SMA bars before and after pre-training treatment was conducted using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The experimental results demonstrated that SMA bars exhibited characteristic flag-shaped hysteretic behavior with distinct tension-compression asymmetry and excellent self-centering capacity under cyclic tension-compression loading. Various pre-training treatments moderately enhanced the martensitic transformation stress by 28.5–39.3% and secant stiffness by 14.5–40.7% at 6% compressive strain. Pre-training had a limited effect on reducing residual strain, and when the strain exceeded 2%, the non-pre-trained specimen exhibited better energy dissipation. Consequently, for SMA bars equipped with buckling-restraint device (BRD) under cyclic tension-compression loading, pre-training may not be essential.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: