A retrospective study evaluates nondiabetic kidney disease prevalence in type 2 diabetes patients, suggesting significant implications for diagnosis and treatment.
Background: Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is the leading cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, a considerable proportion of these patients develop nondiabetic kidney disease (NDKD), which has different therapeutic and prognostic implications. Objective: To evaluate the prevalence, clinical presentation, and histopathological spectrum of NDKD in T2DM patients undergoing renal biopsy. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from T2DM patients who underwent renal biopsy over an 8-year period. Patients with inadequate biopsies, prior renal transplants, or insufficient clinical data were excluded. Biopsy indications included atypical features such as nephrotic-range proteinuria, active urinary sediment, acute kidney injury (AKI), or absence of diabetic retinopathy (DR). Histopathological findings were categorized as: (1) pure DKD, (2) pure NDKD, and (3) NDKD superimposed on DKD. Results: A total of 255 patients were included. The mean age was 49.5 years, with a male-to-female ratio of 3.1:1. Median duration of diabetes was 3.9 years. Hypertension was present in 59% of patients. Nephrotic syndrome was the most common indication for biopsy (42%). Pure DKD was seen in 110 patients (43%), pure NDKD in 85 (33%), and NDKD superimposed on DKD in 60 (24%). Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) was the most frequent NDKD (29%). Conclusion: NDKD is a common finding in T2DM patients presenting with atypical renal features. Clinical and laboratory parameters alone are insufficient to reliably differentiate NDKD from DKD. Renal biopsy remains a crucial tool for accurate diagnosis, influencing treatment and prognosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
International Journal of Medical Science and Advanced Clinical Research (IJMACR) (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: