Key result
Routine LLT in France lags broader Europe, reaching LDL-C goals in only ~23% of high-risk patients.
Why the study?
The study was designed to assess lipid management in different European countries and care settings over 1 year of follow-up.
Does routine lipid-lowering therapy management improve LDL-C goal attainment in high and very high cardiovascular risk patients in France compared to the rest of Europe?
Observational (n=621)
Yes
Does routine lipid-lowering therapy management improve LDL-C goal attainment in high and very high cardiovascular risk patients in France compared to the rest of Europe?
Absolute Event Rate: 23.4% vs 31.6%
Despite increases in combination lipid-lowering therapy over 1 year, the vast majority of high-risk patients in France and Europe fail to achieve guideline-recommended LDL-C goals.
May warrant more aggressive lipid-lowering in high-risk French patients; confirms suboptimal management compared with the rest of Europe.
Background The SANTORINI study (NCT04271280) was designed to assess lipid management in different European countries and care settings over 1 year of follow-up. Here, we report prospective findings of patient characteristics, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal attainment, and treatment patterns of lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) in France and the rest of Europe (RoE; without France) at 1-year follow-up. Materials and methods Patients at high or very high cardiovascular (CV) risk were recruited across 14 European countries from 17 March 2020 to 11 February 2021 and followed for 1 year of prospective follow-up. Results Among 9,559 patients enrolled in the study, 8,802 with available risk classification data and 7,210 with available LDL-C data at baseline and 1-year follow-up were included. Of patients with available LDL-C data, 621 were included in the France cohort and 6,589 were included in the RoE cohort. In the France cohort (full analysis set for risk), investigators classified 20.1% and 79.9% of patients as high and very high CV risk, respectively. When CV risk was recalculated centrally as per the 2019 European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society guidelines, 7.1% and 92.9% of patients in the France cohort were considered high and very high risk, respectively. Total LLT monotherapy and combination therapy use over 1 year increased from 51.2% to 58.5% and 25.3% to 38.2%, respectively. Overall, mean (standard deviation) LDL-C level decreased from 2.6 (1.3) mmol/L to 2.2 (1.2) mmol/L, and LDL-C goal attainment increased from 14.8% to 23.4%. Results in the France cohort were consistent with those observed in the RoE cohort. Conclusions While use of combination LLT and LDL-C goal attainment increased in the France cohort over 1 year of follow-up, the majority of patients remained at an increased risk of CV events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ferrières et al. (2026) conducted an observational in High and very high cardiovascular risk (n=621). Lipid-lowering therapies vs. Rest of Europe cohort was evaluated on LDL-C goal attainment based on ESC/EAS guidelines. LDL-C goal attainment was achieved by only 23.4% of patients in the France cohort, compared to 31.6% in the rest of Europe cohort, indicating continued suboptimal lipid management in high cardiovascular risk patients in France.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: