Prospective study assesses the accuracy of FDG PET/CT for staging in newly diagnosed muscle-invasive bladder cancer, suggesting improved diagnostic capabilities.
Introduction Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is associated with poor prognosis. Current staging relies on CT and MRI, but both show limited sensitivity for nodal and distant metastases. [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT has emerged as a promising tool for staging and response assessment, yet its role remains undefined. Methods and analysis MIBC-PET is a prospective, monocentric, no-profit study with paired imaging comparison enrolling 60 patients with newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed high-grade MIBC. All patients undergo baseline staging with [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT (ceCT) of chest, abdomen, and pelvis. A second [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT and CT are performed after two cycles of neoadjuvant therapy. [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT includes both standard delayed imaging and an early dynamic pelvic acquisition to overcome urinary tracer interference. The primary endpoints are (1) diagnostic accuracy of [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT vs. ceCT for baseline staging, and (2) accuracy of [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT in predicting pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Secondary endpoints include validation of early dynamic [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT for local staging and radiomic/AI-based predictive modeling. Ethics and dissemination The study complies with the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice guidelines. The study was approved by the local ethical committee (CE-AVEC 109-2024-Oss-AOUFe – P.I. Dr. Luca Urso, MD). Results will inform the integration of [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT into diagnostic algorithms for MIBC. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov , identifier: not yet assigned. Local trial registration code: CE-AVEC 109-2024-Oss-AOUFe.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Urso et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: