PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 16, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología0 citationsOpen Access

Observations on the Vocabulary of the 3rd Book of Kingdoms: to the Problem of Reconstruction of the Ancient Slavonic Translation

View Full Paper
RSRostislav Stankov

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate the vocabulary of the Third Book of Kingdoms in ancient Slavonic translations.
  • Examined ten manuscripts of the Third Book of Kingdoms, including Middle Bulgarian and Old Russian texts.
  • Focused on rare vocabulary, including hapax legomena and individual lexical readings.
  • Contrasted the Middle Bulgarian manuscripts with Old Russian versions.
  • Identified and clarified several rare lexemes in the earliest translation.
  • Discovered signs of partial lexical editing in Middle Bulgarian manuscripts.
  • Suggested the need for further examination of more material for comprehensive understanding.

Abstract

In the history of Slavonic literature, the Books of Kingdoms were translated twice: the first translation was presumably produced at the turn of the ninth and tenth centuries, and the second during the Middle Bulgarian period. Ten manuscripts containing the text of the Third Book of Kingdoms, either in full or in part, are currently available: two Middle Bulgarian manuscripts and eight Old Russian ones. To date, only a limited portion of the vocabulary of the earliest translation of the Third Book of Kingdoms has been examined, namely rare words and items identified as hapax legomena. Within the analysis of rare lexemes, individual lexical readings are also discussed, the meanings of several words are clarified (zasobitъ, lakinija, očьce, pokrǫta, stьblь/stьplь, utroiti), and primary readings are identified. One of the most recent studies of the earliest translation of the Books of Kingdoms contrasts the Middle Bulgarian manuscripts with the Old Russian ones. On the basis of the analysis of rare vocabulary, it appears that the Middle Bulgarian copies reflect partial lexical editing of the text. Further clarification of this issue requires the examination of a larger body of material.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rostislav Stankov (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b79e488166e15b153ab687https://doi.org/10.36253/studi_slavis-17786
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper