Examines AI liability's impact on autonomy and R&D, highlighting potential benefits and drawbacks.
We study optimal liability for AI-powered products. Like human users, artificial intelligence (AI) can cause product failures that harm third parties. Additionally, it may introduce extreme risks of large-scale harm that renders full liability impractical. Raising AI liability for ordinary loss above actual harm can decrease excessive autonomy and increase social welfare, even when it negatively impacts R&D efforts. A well-designed liability rule implements efficient levels of autonomy and balanced R&D that reduces AI’s general risk. However, under targeted R&D to reduce AI’s extreme risk, full efficiency cannot be achieved with liability, and regulations limiting such risk can perform better.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: