Key result
Naples Prognostic Score linked to ~230% higher odds of appropriate ICD therapy in HFrEF.
Why the study?
To evaluate the predictive value of the Naples prognostic score and other nutritional indices for appropriate ICD therapy in primary prevention patients with HFrEF.
Do nutritional indices (NPS, PNI, CONUT) predict appropriate ICD therapy in patients with HFrEF receiving primary prevention ICDs?
Cohort (n=288)
No
Do nutritional indices (NPS, PNI, CONUT) predict appropriate ICD therapy in patients with HFrEF receiving primary prevention ICDs?
While nutritional indices like NPS, PNI, and CONUT show univariate associations with appropriate ICD therapy in HFrEF patients, only lower BMI, higher LVESD, and elevated albumin are independent predictors in multivariable analysis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not rely on NPS, PNI or CONUT for ICD therapy prediction in HFrEF; leaves open incremental value of BMI, LVESD and albumin.
No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Könte et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (n=288). Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy vs. No appropriate ICD therapy was evaluated on Predictive value of the Naples Prognostic Score for appropriate ICD therapy (OR: 3.303, 95% CI 1.846-5.910, p=<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: